Combat Mission Shock Force: British Module Demo Released

Battlefront just announced the release of a v1.20 demo including contents from the British Forces and Marines modules.

... the all new v1.20 demo for Combat Mission Shock Force, including British Forces and Marines content, is out now!!! With an additional and completely new British mission, the demo showcases all the new features of the latest v1.20 of the series, includes full multiplayer functionality and a total of 5 (!) missions.

As for the British Forces module, the word is that they are working on the installers so the release won't be until the next week.

Link to the demo

Cheers,

"The Power of Paper", an article by Michael Peck at TSJ

In the latest issue of Training and Simulation Journal, Michael Peck has an article about board gaming. Unfortunately, this article is only available in the print version of the journal so I can't link you to it.

Mr. Peck makes a point about how boardgames are still relevant and great tools to understand historical conflicts. He focuses in tactical wargames, including the almighty Advanced Squad Leader. A bit more detail is provided on relatively recent boardgames, like "Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear" (Academy Games).

"Conflict of Heroes: Awakening the Bear". Image from Academy Games used without authorization or monetary gain. Comment below if you want it removed.

I was kind of surprised to see an article about paper wargames surrounded by ads for computer simulation projectors that cost around $100K a piece.

I never played a paper wargame so I'm not in a position to judge. But anyway, one must remember that right after the news that Saddam invaded Kuwait broke, a high level Pentagon official called Booz Allen Hamilton's wargames honcho Mark Herman demanding a quick reaction wargame on the crisis. Mr. Herman was already wargaming the crisis with his peers. The game of choice was "Gulf Strike", a boardgame Mr. Herman had published a time before.

"Gulf Strike", the boardgame by Mark Herman. Image from boardgamegeek.com used without authorization or monetary gain. Comment below if you want it removed.

Cheers,

DCS Black Shark 1.0.1 Patch: Read Me File Available

The "read me" for the upcoming 1.0.1 patch is available at the DCS Black Shark Official forums.

And just when I was half-way proficient with trimming of the helicopter, this:

In addition to the original trimmer implementation, in which control input is disabled for 1 second to allow the player to quickly re-center his controls, a new method is included in version 1.0.1, using a different re-centering logic. In the new method, control input is disabled until the player returns the controls to their neutral position. This allows the player to re-center his controls smoothly, minimizing unwanted control input.

The new trimmer logic is optional and is selected ON by default upon installation of the patch. Selection of the trimmer implementation is available in the GAMEPLAY menu of the game options.

The Yaw (heading) autopilot channel functionality has also been redesigned. If the yaw rate is under 3 deg/sec. when the trimmer button is released, the autopilot will stabilize the helicopter heading. If the yaw rate is greater than 3 deg/sec., the autopilot will stabilize the yaw rate to maintain the turn.

This sounds better than the current trimmer implementation. Nonetheless is going to take some time to re-learn.

Totally unrelated image from a previous entry: tactical landing! Do not attempt this at home, folks!

Cheers,

In case you haven't noticed ...

This blog has a new banner! :)

It's the second time that I get goodies from this great freelance artist.

Cheers,

The "Push Button War" Myth and Wargaming

The "Push Button War" myth is the wide-spread notion that NATO superpowers win wars with the ease of pushing a button just because their arsenal is so superior.

In this forum discussion, it is hinted that the lack of challenge in Combat Mission Shock Force is that it lacks a worthy opponent with the right tools of war.

The notion that modern superpowers can win wars with little effort may have started when the first Tomahawk missiles flew from the Persian Gulf to Iraq back in 1991. Ever since then, there is this pervasive view that if a NATO superpower goes to war, it should be a short and almost blood-less affair.

There is no doubt that NATO superpowers have awesome tools of destruction. The superiority of equipment is in our favor. Every branch of the US Armed forces (except for the US Marine Corps, whom our leaders have chosen to ignore at our own peril) has the fanciest tools a professional soldier can imagine. We have the biggest guns, case closed ...

... Not!

You don't have to be a military insider to grasp how hard, tactically challenging and blood-letting is to fight modern wars.

Battle of Fallujah, almost a casualty every block of urban combat

Big fight at An-Nasiriyah during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Even friendly fire incidents!










Battle of Fallujah again, it is heart breaking to see how you can loose half a platoon in just a few blocks of urban fighting





What it has driven our armed forces into victory is not having the biggest guns but the training and prowess of our servicemen.





In this book, Stephen Biddle argues that in an armed conflict, even when one side has an edge in technology, training is the determining factor for victory and the best indicator of military power. If you have a chance to read this book, take a special peek at his war gaming of the Battle of 73 Easting.

Back to Combat Mission Shock Force, in the same way that hastily thrown together trivia doesn't help to understand a particular topic, data worshiping is not a good way to understand modern conflict.

The argument that Combat Mission Shock Force is un-challenging because the Syrians have less than stellar arsenal is way off. In real life, a war with Syria would be not a cakewalk. Combat Mission Shock Force is un-challenging because poor scenario design and other flaws in the game engine.

Is the myth of unbeatable modern NATO forces going to make war game developers shy away from designing modern conflict war games and simulations?

I hope not.

Cheers,

ArmA 2: Friendly Fire Incident

I was practicing the command and control of fires at the squad level (details to come in a future blog entry) and my command skills were so good that my virtual Marines started shooting each other!

Seriously, this is what happened. I was in charge of a squad of Marines, moving to contact down a road. I was on point when I saw a squad-sized enemy patrol (Russian infantry) at a distant crossroad. I immediately ordered my Marines to hit the dirt and hold fire. I thought I could bag half of the Russians with the first volley if I bring the 3 squad automatic weapons (SAWs) up front. Predicting that the surviving Russian infantry would try to flank us, I ordered a couple of riflemen to stay just behind the SAWs as a maneuver buddy-pair that would block the assaulting Russians and buy some time for the SAWs so they could reposition.

After pointing targets for most of the squad members, I ordered everybody to open fire. It's always nice to see smoke coming out simultaneously from 3 SAWs' ...

And then I heard one of the automatic rifleman in front of me say "Cease fire, #$#@#it!".
Friendly fire, who the hell is messing up?

It was not me, I haven't shot a single round. It was one of the riflemen, whose line of fire had the automatic rifleman in it.

Screenshot taken moments after the friendly fire incident. See image below for an explanation. Image is clickeable.

Captioned image showing the position of the enemy in the far background, the automatic rifleman hit by friendly fire and the offending rifleman who messed up. Image is clickeable.

I'm humbled. This incident shows that I should be very careful positioning the Marines and watching out for their fields of fire. It also speaks volumes of ArmA 2's simulation capabilities.

The automatic rifleman survived and he is recovering from his wounds.

Cheers,

Combat Mission Shock Force British Module, Release is Imminent

Making fun of the secrecy around the release of the British Forces module, Battlefront says "if people know our announcement pattern... at this point no news is very good news".


Taking into account their announcement pattern and the previous remark, the release of the British module should be early next week.

Cheers,

2009 Joint Services Open House, More Pictures

This event was in May 2009 and I still have a lot of pictures from it. Today, the F-16 and a USAF band passing by a vintage military transport.

Cheers,

Shrapnel Games' 10 Year Anniversary Sale

Full disclosure: I'm not affiliated with neither Shrapnel Games nor Prosim. I just like their stuff!

I received an e-mail about the big 10 Year Anniversary sale at Shrapnel Games.

• Battle Group Commander Episode One ($4.00 off) at $10.95
• Air Assault Task Force ($7.00 off) at $37.95
• The Falklands War ($8.00 off) at $36.95
• Raging Tiger: The Second Korean War ($8.00 off) at $36.95

Offer ends July 22.

Cheers,

Combat Mission Shock Force: British Module, Manual Available

Battlefront has made available the manual for their upcoming their Combat Mission Shock Force British Module.

I briefly browsed the manual yesterday and it has a very good summary about on the British forces and equipment we will soon command into battle.

The British module will bring up the CMSF engine to its v1.2 version. Updates for the v1.2 version are available in an updated manual.

Taking gossip and previous posts by the developers at the official forums, it looks like the release of this module is imminent.

Cheers,