A Schutzen company (right) and a light panzer company (left) deployed near the town of Watte. Note the size of the units: platoons and sections (weapons sections). |
Panther's game engine (Command Ops Battles from the Bulge, Conquest of the Aegean, Highway to the Reich) so far have simulated warfare at the grand-tactical/operational levels. The recipe for success was a game engine with no hexes, continuous time and modeling forces beyond the usual weapon systems and effects. The game engine features a fully dynamic command and control system that simulates order delays, attached and detached units and overburdened HQs. On top of all this wargaming goodness, a logistics system accounts for every gallon of fuel spent and every shell fired. A lot of things going on, yet most of it is automated and ran by a strong artificial intelligence allowing the player to intervene when he finds it adequate.
The appeal of a game with a purely tactical scope including all the goodies discussed above is great. But the task of "going tactical" is not trivial. This is not just a matter of throwing smaller units in smaller maps. Almost every aspect of the inner workings of the game engine is being revised, modified and tweaked to simulate combat between smaller forces.
The maps will represent smaller chunks of terrain but will be more detailed. The effects of a more detailed terrain model on lines of sight, gunnery and troop movement is being worked on right now.
An intermediate zoom of the same map above, this time at a scale of 8 meters per pixel. Plenty of real estate for combat. |
Join a discussion of this game, right here.
Cheers,
Awesome, I thought that before, somebody should combine Close Combat with Command ops or COTA, that will be incredible, the great maps of CC (it's a shame the poor IA in those games) with the incredible IA from COTA. This is kind of like that, only a little more larger, but it's going to be really good.
ReplyDeleteFavourite wargame series now does my favourite scale, what more could I want? Set in Stalingrad I suppose (Love to fight the factory district, still really looking forward to this.
ReplyDeleteJ, regarding your comment:
ReplyDelete"Almost every aspect of the inner workings of the game engine is being revised, modified and tweaked to simulate combat between smaller forces."
This is not exactly the case... the engine itself will remain unchanged, any change to account for the smaller scale is being handled with creative manipulation of the data. Everything is effected by the data, movement rates, fuel consumption and fuel loads, rates of fire, different order delays based on communications differences, etc. the data is what is being overhauled, not the engine itself.
So yes it will be BFTB basically with smaller units, but I don't see that as a bad thing, as the engine, except for a few things that would be nice to have for this scale, handles the smaller scale very well.
Bil
This is so great. This will be an instant buy for me. I have all Panther Games and I love them. Nothing comes as close to real milityra operstions as the CO Series
ReplyDeleteoh my - this could be a winner for me - completely out of the blue news - love it when that happens
ReplyDeleteThe movement maps were really interesting to me. I'm working on something similar myself (although much, much simpler) and have been thinking about how to efficiently do movement on a vectorized map. I use raw polygon checks, but perhaps a coarse map like this is simply good enough.
ReplyDeletechakie said...
ReplyDelete"The movement maps were really interesting to me. I'm working on something similar myself (although much, much simpler) and have been thinking about how to efficiently do movement on a vectorized map. I use raw polygon checks, but perhaps a coarse map like this is simply good enough."
There are numbers behind the gray scale movement maps.. for example white = 0% movement (or movement blocked), while black = 100% movement (road, highway, etc.), the shades of gray are visual representations of the actual numerical value given that particular square.
Bil
Thanks Bil for the clarification.
ReplyDeleteCheers,
JC