But I don't want to leave you with just my apathy for Microsoft Flight. As pathetic as it is, let's review the reviews. :p
There is a great commentary about it at SimHQ. Favorite quote on flight modelling "crashing actually takes some work".
Another review at the Flying magazine calls it a big disappointment. Favorite quote about the pricing model "Microsoft expects users to pay for add-on content, and maybe some would. My guess is few pilots will." (bold is mine)
The guys at Rock Paper Shotgun have a great article on it too. With their usual awesome style they wrote a piece that is both gobs of fun and informative if you can read between the lines. When they post a picture of an Icon A5 landed in impossible places, you laugh ... And if you were expecting a flight simulator, then you cry a bit afterwards.
AVSIM has its review too. Long. As an apology to an angry wife. AVSIM loves Flight with a passion and that's OK. But if you go through their forums, it feels like if AVSIM has adopted a sort of policy about Flight, and that is you like it or you are out. These guys have completely lost credibility with me. It is just plainly embarrassing to browse their Flight forums and see staff and other assorted honchos criticizing negative reviews of Flight like the two first above. It is not kosher to criticize other reviews on petty flaws. Sorry AVSIM guys but I will stay away from your webpage for a long while. But thank you anyway for the big advertisement banner that forwarded me to Flight's webpage ...